Using Closing Codes to Improve Maintenance Insights for CNG Passenger Buses

By: Christian Kepner

One of the most powerful tools in any Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) system is often overlooked: Closing Codes. These codes—categorized as Problem, Failure, Cause, and Action—provide critical insights into what went wrong with an asset, why it happened, and how it was resolved.

When properly implemented and consistently used, closing codes support more intelligent budgeting, preventative maintenance, and fleet performance improvement decisions. For transit fleets—especially those operating Passenger Buses powered by Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)—closing codes are vital for tracking recurring issues, identifying weak components, and improving service reliability.

What are Closing Codes?

Closing codes are structured data fields filled out by technicians during or after maintenance work. Here’s how they function:

Problem Code – What was reported or observed (e.g., No Start, Engine Misfire).
Failure Code – The specific failed component (e.g., CNG Tank, Fuel Injector).
Cause Code – Why the failure happened (e.g., Low Pressure, Electrical Fault).
Action Code – What corrective action was taken (e.g., Recharge Tank, Replace Part)?

This standardized approach allows maintenance teams and asset managers to analyze trends, support reliability-centered maintenance (RCM), and justify capital planning decisions.

Real-World Hierarchy: CNG Passenger Buses

To illustrate, here’s a data-driven sample of typical closing code combinations from a fleet of CNG Passenger Buses:

Each row in this table represents a commonly occurring maintenance pattern. Capturing and analyzing these relationships allows for the following:

Faster troubleshooting by front-line mechanics
Improved parts stocking and planning
More effective root cause analysis (RCA)
Better performance tracking of specific vehicle makes, models, and systems

Why It Matters

Without closing codes, EAM systems offer only basic metrics: cost, time, and completion status. However, with structured data like this, organizations can identify which components are failing prematurely, whether root causes are being addressed, and which actions are most effective.

In a time when transit agencies are under pressure to stretch every maintenance dollar while minimizing downtime, the consistent use of closing codes is a simple but transformative practice.

Next Steps

If your organization isn’t currently enforcing the use of closing codes, or if the lists are too generic to be helpful, now is the time to revisit your setup:

Tailor codes to specific asset classes (e.g., CNG Buses, HVAC Units, Railcars).
Limit options to the most common and actionable 6–10 entries per category.
Train staff to use them consistently and review them for quality and trends.

Your EAM data is only as good as what goes in. Closing codes is key to turning work orders into insightful, actionable intelligence.

Value solutions

Value solutions